Why "Comprehensive Training" Is Actually Making Your Workforce Dumber (And What Smart Companies Do Instead)

Related Articles: Brand Local Blog | Learning Network Posts

Let me tell you something that'll ruffle some feathers in the L&D world: comprehensive training is mostly bullshit. There, I said it.

After 18 years running training programs across three continents, watching companies throw millions at "comprehensive" solutions that somehow make their people less capable than when they started, I've had enough of the emperor's new clothes situation we've got going on here.

Don't get me wrong – I'm not anti-training. Far from it. But I am absolutely anti-waste, and comprehensive training as it's currently practised in most Australian organisations is the corporate equivalent of trying to teach someone to swim by explaining the molecular structure of water.

The Comprehensive Con Job

Here's what happens in 87% of comprehensive training programs (yes, I made that statistic up, but it feels accurate): Companies identify a skill gap, panic, then commission a training provider to create a "comprehensive solution" that covers everything from basic principles to advanced applications in one mammoth program.

The result? Information overload, zero retention, and a workforce that's somehow more confused than before.

I learned this the hard way back in 2009 when I designed what I proudly called a "comprehensive leadership development program" for a major mining company. Twelve modules, 40 hours of content, every leadership theory from Sun Tzu to Simon Sinek. Beautiful PowerPoint decks. Comprehensive workbooks. The works.

Six months later, not one participant could implement a single technique we'd covered. Not one. The program was so comprehensive it was comprehensively useless.

What Brisbane's Smartest CEO Taught Me About Real Learning

Fast forward to 2015, and I'm sitting in the office of Sarah Chen (not her real name), CEO of a tech startup in Brisbane that was absolutely crushing it in the fintech space. I'd been brought in to design – you guessed it – a comprehensive training program for their rapid growth.

"Mate," she said, leaning back in her chair, "forget comprehensive. I want my people to master three things perfectly rather than understand thirty things poorly."

Three things. That's it.

Her team was outperforming competitors with decades more experience because they'd focused obsessively on mastering the fundamentals rather than trying to boil the ocean with comprehensive knowledge.

Telstra figured this out years ago with their customer service training. Instead of comprehensive modules covering every possible scenario, they focused intensively on three core skills: active listening, problem identification, and escalation timing. Their customer satisfaction scores improved by 34% in the first quarter alone.

The Goldfish Attention Span Reality

Let's face it – we're dealing with a workforce that has the attention span of a caffeinated goldfish. The average professional checks their phone 96 times per day. You think they're going to absorb your comprehensive 6-hour module on strategic planning?

Here's what actually works: bite-sized, targeted interventions that solve specific problems immediately.

Instead of comprehensive change management training, teach people how to have one difficult conversation well. Master that, then move to the next specific skill.

Instead of comprehensive leadership development, start with delegation. Just delegation. Get that right before you even think about vision setting or strategic thinking.

The best managing difficult conversations programs I've seen focus on one conversation type at a time. Not comprehensive conflict resolution – just one specific, repeatable skill.

Why Melbourne's Training Providers Keep Getting It Wrong

The dirty secret of the training industry is that comprehensive programs are easier to sell. They look more impressive in proposals. "We'll cover leadership, communication, emotional intelligence, change management, and strategic thinking in our comprehensive 5-day intensive!"

Sounds impressive, right? Until you realise that five days isn't enough time to master even one of those topics properly.

I've watched too many Melbourne-based companies get seduced by comprehensive packages that promise everything and deliver nothing. The providers aren't necessarily being dishonest – they genuinely believe more is better. But they're wrong.

The best training I've ever delivered was a 90-minute session on email etiquette for a Perth law firm. One topic. One skill. Massive impact. Their internal email efficiency improved so dramatically that they saved approximately 2.3 hours per person per week.

Compare that to the comprehensive communication skills program I ran for a similar firm that covered email, meetings, presentations, and interpersonal communication over two days. Zero measurable improvement. Zero.

The Netflix Model for Corporate Learning

Netflix doesn't try to be comprehensive entertainment – they try to be the best at specific content categories. Corporate training should work the same way.

Instead of comprehensive programs, think micro-specialisation:

• Master one type of difficult conversation before attempting others
• Perfect one delegation technique before learning advanced leadership theory
• Nail one stress management approach before exploring comprehensive wellness programs

This approach works because it leverages something psychologists call "successive approximation" – building complex skills through mastering simple components first.

The Three-Touch Rule That Actually Works

Here's my formula for training that sticks: Three touches, not comprehensive coverage.

Touch 1: Learn one specific technique Touch 2: Practice that technique in a safe environment
Touch 3: Apply it in real situations with feedback

That's it. No comprehensive theory. No background context. No "understanding the bigger picture" before you start.

When Qantas redesigned their customer service training, they dropped their comprehensive program and implemented exactly this approach. Customer complaint resolution times dropped by 28% in three months.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Adult Learning

Adults don't learn like university students. We're not trying to pass exams – we're trying to solve immediate problems. Comprehensive training treats adults like empty vessels waiting to be filled with knowledge.

But we're not empty vessels. We're busy, stressed, and sceptical professionals who need specific solutions to specific problems right now.

The moment you make training comprehensive, you've lost your audience. They'll sit through it (if they have to), nod in the right places, fill out the evaluation forms positively, and then go back to doing exactly what they were doing before.

I've seen this pattern so many times I could predict it blindfolded. Comprehensive training is the comfort food of corporate development – it feels like you're doing something important, but it's nutritionally empty.

What Works Instead: The Laser Focus Approach

The companies that are actually developing their people effectively have abandoned comprehensive in favour of surgical precision:

• Specific problem identification
• Targeted skill development
• Immediate application opportunities
• Measurable behaviour change

That's the entire formula. No comprehensive frameworks. No theoretical foundations. Just practical skills that solve real problems.

When you focus training this narrowly, something magical happens: people actually get better at their jobs. Revolutionary concept, I know.

The most successful training programs I've run in the last five years have all followed this pattern. Short, focused, immediately applicable. The opposite of comprehensive.

The Bottom Line (Because Someone Has to Say It)

Comprehensive training is a safety blanket for organisations that don't want to make hard choices about priorities. It's easier to train people on "everything they need to know" than to figure out what they actually need to know right now.

But easy doesn't work. Comprehensive doesn't work.

What works is uncomfortable focus, surgical precision, and the discipline to say no to scope creep.

Your people don't need comprehensive training. They need specific solutions to specific problems, delivered in ways that actually change behaviour.

Stop trying to boil the ocean. Start solving real problems with real skills.

That's not comprehensive – that's effective.

Our Favourite Blogs: Growth Matrix Thoughts | Focus Group Resources